HO: There is no statistically significant difference between the proportion of male road workers in Copper Atoll who are registered to vote and the proportion of N.C. citizens at large who are registered to vote.
HA: There is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of male road workers in Copper Atoll who are registered to vote and the proportion of N.C. citizens at large who are registered to vote.
Rejection criteria: alpha .05, Zsc 1.96
p = 0.6061
q = 0.3939
n = 3
Sp = √((0.6061x0.3939)/3) = 0.2821
Zsc = (0.6666-0.6061)/0.2821 = 0.2145
Since the test statistic of 0.2145 does not meet or exceed the critical value of 1.96, there is insufficient evidence to conclude there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of male road workers in Copper Atoll who are registered to vote and the proportion of N.C. citizens at large who are registered to vote. Based upon these sample data I fail to reject the null hypothesis.
1 http://www.cs.duke.edu/~ju
2 http://www.newsobserver.co
I am aware that the ridiculously small, exclusively male sample of road workers fails to meet two of the three assumptions necessary for a legitimate one sample z-test and that the small sample size was an influential factor in the rejection of HO. This is all in good fun. Statistically I must admit that there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of male road workers in Copper Atoll who are registered to vote and the proportion of N.C. citizens at large who are registered to vote, but in my heart I fully accept HA in all its truth and splendor.
No comments:
Post a Comment